Scale/Scope:
12 communes from one rural Vietnam (6 intervention, 6 control)
Evaluation Design:
Longitudinal – 238 children 5-25 months old (119 intervention, 119 control)
Outcomes
Outcomes Measured:
Frequency of consuming PD foods (times per day) - baseline
Results:
4.3 vs. 4.2
P-values/CIs:
NS
High Impact Practices:
Ensuring nutrient content of foods
Outcomes Measured:
Frequency of consuming PD foods (times per day) - month 2-6 of intervention
Results:
4.1 vs. 3.6
P-values/CIs:
p<0.05
High Impact Practices:
Ensuring nutrient content of foods
Outcomes Measured:
Frequency of consuming PD foods (times per day) - month 12 of intervention
Results:
3.8 vs. 3.7
P-values/CIs:
NS
High Impact Practices:
Ensuring nutrient content of foods
Outcomes Measured:
Quantity of food consumed (g) - baseline
Results:
262.2 vs. 243.5
P-values/CIs:
NS
High Impact Practices:
Providing adequate meal frequency and energy density
Outcomes Measured:
Quantity of food consumed (g) - month 2-6 of intervention
Results:
299.7 vs. 254.5
P-values/CIs:
p<0.05
High Impact Practices:
Providing adequate meal frequency and energy density
Outcomes Measured:
Quantity of food consumed (g) - month 12 of intervention
Results:
409.8 vs. 340.3
P-values/CIs:
p<0.01
High Impact Practices:
Providing adequate meal frequency and energy density
Outcomes Measured:
Meal time frequency (per day) - baseline
Results:
4.6 vs. 4.4
P-values/CIs:
NS
High Impact Practices:
Providing adequate meal frequency and energy density
Outcomes Measured:
Meal time frequency (per day) - month 2-6 of intervention
Results:
4.6 vs. 4.2
P-values/CIs:
p<0.01
High Impact Practices:
Providing adequate meal frequency and energy density
Outcomes Measured:
Meal time frequency (per day) - month 12 of intervention
Results:
4.9 ± 1.5 vs. 4.4
P-values/CIs:
p<0.01
High Impact Practices:
Providing adequate meal frequency and energy density
Outcomes Measured:
Energy intake (kcal) - baseline
Results:
629.2 vs. 596.6
P-values/CIs:
NS
High Impact Practices:
Providing adequate meal frequency and energy density
Outcomes Measured:
Energy intake (kcal) - month 2-6 of intervention
Results:
662.7 vs. 597.4
P-values/CIs:
NS
High Impact Practices:
Providing adequate meal frequency and energy density
Outcomes Measured:
Energy intake (kcal) - month 12 of intervention
Results:
826.9 vs. 718.4
P-values/CIs:
NS
High Impact Practices:
Providing adequate meal frequency and energy density
Outcomes Measured:
Proportion met energy (kcal/kg) requirements - baseline
Results:
66.4% vs. 62.2%
P-values/CIs:
NS
High Impact Practices:
Providing adequate meal frequency and energy density
Outcomes Measured:
Proportion met energy (kcal/kg) requirements - month 2-6 of intervention
Results:
49.0% vs. 35.1%
P-values/CIs:
p<0.01
High Impact Practices:
Providing adequate meal frequency and energy density
Outcomes Measured:
Proportion met energy (kcal/kg) requirements - month 12 of intervention
Results:
31.3% vs. 23.5%
P-values/CIs:
NS
High Impact Practices:
Providing adequate meal frequency and energy density